OneUp Trader: Keep the Best Day Out of the Other-Days Sum
OneUp Trader's evaluation help page describes programme day minimums, a consistency test and placement with funding partners. This source guide, checked 24 October 2026, concentrates on the consistency arithmetic and the records it needs. It does not turn that one calculation into a complete funding decision.
Continue with this site's separate research worksheet
Identify the programme and the exact consistency method
The reviewed page gives a ten-day minimum for its Evaluation Account and five days for Pro Evaluation, excluding weekends and holidays. Separately, it describes summing three other best days' net profits to reach at least 80% of the largest day. It also supplies a two-day consistency example; that example does not remove the programme's overall day minimum.
Keep the selected method and the account type in the same review. Do not import a different firm's best-day percentage formula or assume that satisfying a consistency component establishes all other conditions for placement.
An original four-day illustration
Take invented net-profit records of 1,200, 350, 325 and 300 units on four distinct provider days. The largest day is 1,200; its 80% comparison amount is 960. The other three records sum to 975, which is 15 above 960.
This example satisfies that arithmetic comparison only. It is four invented records, not evidence of ten or five eligible trading days, a complete profit target, drawdown compliance or a real account. Do not reuse the 1,200 largest-day record inside the “other days” sum.
| Quantity | Calculation | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Largest provider day | 1,200 invented units | Excluded from the other-days sum |
| Comparison amount | 1,200 × 80% = 960 | Selected method |
| Other three days | 350 + 325 + 300 = 975 | 975 ≥ 960 |
| Remaining conditions | Day minimum, target and risk rules | Not proved by this calculation |
A duplicate observation is not another traded day
Before ranking the days, retain each provider-day identifier and its net result after the applicable commissions. If a statement is imported twice, deduplicate the observation rather than allowing it to create another day or increase the sum.
The selected help page states its trading window in CT. A Singapore display date should be kept alongside that stated provider reference, not substituted for it. Missing day records remain missing; they are not invented zero-profit days. This is a recording method, not advice to add trades to satisfy a test.
Use separate evidence for placement and payment
A consistency calculation, successful evaluation, partner placement and an actual payment require different records. The selected rule page does not establish a personal allocation, an employment relationship or a guaranteed reward. No evaluation or funding-partner account was tested here.
The optional HashHedge link concerns a different programme. OneUp day records, a consistency result or placement eligibility do not transfer through that link. Review the destination's own conditions before choosing whether to register.
Sources and rule dates
- OneUp Trader: selected evaluation rules
Checked 2026-10-24. Programme-day minimums, consistency methods and CT window; not all account/partner terms or a personal pass.